Question
Did Jesus have brothers and sisters?
Analysis
At a glance, what the texts say
| Passage | What it reports |
|---|---|
| Matthew 13:55; Matthew 13:56 | The Nazareth crowd names four brothers, James, Joseph, Simon and Judas, and refers to his sisters. |
| Mark 6:3 | The same scene, with the names as James, Joses, Judas and Simon, and sisters again. |
| John 2:12 | After Cana, Jesus goes down to Capernaum with his mother, his brothers and his disciples. |
| John 7:5 | His brothers did not believe in him during his ministry. |
| Mark 3:31; Mark 3:32 | His mother and brothers come looking for him while he is teaching. |
| Acts 1:14 | After the ascension the disciples pray together with Mary and with his brothers. |
| 1 Corinthians 9:5 | Paul refers to "the brothers of the Lord" as a recognised group. |
| Galatians 1:19 | Paul meets James, whom he calls the Lord's brother. |
Two of the New Testament letters are traditionally attributed to these men, James and Jude, though neither writer identifies himself by that relationship. Jude calls himself a brother of James (Jude 1:1).
The word at the centre of the debate
The Greek adelphos (G0080) most naturally means a brother by birth, and that is how it is used across the New Testament for literal siblings. Two further facts are agreed by all sides and matter to the argument:
- adelphos is also used figuratively throughout the New Testament for fellow believers, which nobody disputes and which is not the sense in these passages.
- In the Greek Old Testament, adelphos sometimes renders a Hebrew word covering a wider kinship than a literal brother, which is the basis for the cousin reading. Lot, for instance, is Abraham's nephew but is called his "brother" in that broader idiom (Genesis 14:14; compare Genesis 11:27).
Greek also has a specific word for cousin, anepsios, and Paul uses it of Mark in relation to Barnabas (Colossians 4:10). Those who read the brothers as siblings point to that word not being used here; those who read them as kin point to the Semitic idiom behind the Gospel writers' Greek.
The three readings
| View | Position | Chiefly held by |
|---|---|---|
| Siblings (often called the Helvidian view) | Younger children of Mary and Joseph, born after Jesus. Reads adelphos in its ordinary sense and takes Matthew 1:25 and Luke 2:7 as pointing the same way. | Most Protestant traditions. |
| Stepbrothers (the Epiphanian view) | Children of Joseph by an earlier marriage, so older than Jesus and not Mary's children. Appeals to early tradition and to the care of Mary being entrusted to John rather than to a brother (John 19:26; John 19:27). | Eastern Orthodoxy, and some early Western writers. |
| Cousins or close kin (the Hieronymian view) | Relatives rather than siblings, reading adelphos in the wider Semitic sense; often connected to the Mary of John 19:25 and Mark 15:40. | Roman Catholicism. |
The texts each side leans on
- For siblings: Matthew 1:25 says Joseph knew her not until she had given birth to a son, which many read as implying a normal marriage afterwards; Luke 2:7 calls Jesus her firstborn; and the brothers appear repeatedly as a family group alongside Mary.
- Against that reading: "until" and "firstborn" are both argued to be statements about what had happened up to that point rather than about what followed, and firstborn is a legal and covenantal term (Exodus 13:2) that says nothing about later children.
- For stepbrothers or cousins: the entrusting of Mary to the disciple at the cross (John 19:26; John 19:27) is read as strange if she had other sons; the counter is that his brothers did not yet believe in him (John 7:5), which would explain it.
What is not in dispute
All three readings agree that these people existed, that they were closely connected to Jesus' household, that at least some of them did not believe in him during his ministry, and that James became a leader of the Jerusalem church after the resurrection (Acts 15:13; Galatians 2:9). The change in James, from sceptic to leader, is common ground across the traditions.