Where the Nephilim appear
| Text | What it says |
|---|---|
| Genesis 6:1-4 | "The sons of God" took "the daughters of men"; … (KJV renders Nephilim "giants.") |
| Numbers 13:33 | The spies in Canaan: … |
The Hebrew nephilim is often linked to the root "to fall" (fallen ones) or taken as a loanword; the KJV's "giants" follows the Septuagint's gigantes. The text says they were "mighty men… of renown," and the Anakim (sons of Anak) are described elsewhere as unusually tall and strong (Deuteronomy 9:2).
The big question: who were "the sons of God" in Genesis 6?
| View | Position | Held by (tradition) |
|---|---|---|
| Fallen angels / angelic union | "Sons of God" = angelic beings whose union with women produced the Nephilim. The oldest attested view (Second-Temple Judaism, 1 Enoch); supported by appeals to Jude 6 and 2 Peter 2:4 (angels who sinned / left their estate) and the OT use of "sons of God" for heavenly beings (Job 1:6; Job 38:7). | The earliest Jewish reading; many early church fathers; common today, esp. with the angels-bound texts. |
| Sethite line (godly line of Seth) | "Sons of God" = the godly line of Seth, "daughters of men" = the ungodly line of Cain; the sin is unequal/compromising marriage, not angelic union. | Augustine; much of the later Western + Reformed tradition. |
| Dynastic rulers / "divine" kings | "Sons of God" = powerful rulers or kings claiming divine status; the Nephilim are their renowned warrior offspring. | A scholarly view drawing on ancient Near-Eastern royal ideology. |
This reference notes all three are held by serious interpreters and does not adjudicate the Gen.6 question (it touches angelology, the meaning of "sons of God," and how to read Jude 6 / 2 Peter 2:4).
The post-flood puzzle
Numbers 13:33 places Nephilim (via the Anakim) after the flood, while Gen.6-7 has the flood destroying all but Noah's family. How the name recurs is itself debated:
- The spies exaggerated, Numbers 13:33 is part of the bad report the faithless spies gave (Numbers 13:32 calls it "an evil report"); the comparison may be rhetorical hyperbole, not a genealogical claim.
- "Nephilim" became a label for any giant-warrior people, the later Anakim were called Nephilim by reputation, not necessarily descent.
- A second occurrence, Genesis 6:4 says "and also after that," which some read as allowing later, separate appearances.
Was Goliath a Nephilim?
What the text states: Goliath was a Philistine champion from Gath, of extraordinary height (1 Samuel 17:4). He belonged to a line of Gath giants, the rapha/Rephaim, explicitly: 2 Samuel 21:15-22 (cf. 1 Chronicles 20:4-8) lists Goliath and other Gath giants as … And Gath is named as one of the few places where the Anakim remained after Joshua's conquest (Joshua 11:22).
What the text does NOT state: the Bible never calls Goliath a "Nephilim." He is called a giant of the Rephaim line of Gath. Because Gath is linked to surviving Anakim (Joshua 11:22), and the spies linked Anakim to Nephilim (Numbers 13:33), a chain of inference connects Goliath → Gath/Anakim → Nephilim, but that is an interpretive inference, not a biblical statement, and it rides on the contested post-flood-Nephilim question above.
| Question | Honest answer |
|---|---|
| Was Goliath a giant? | Yes, explicitly (1 Samuel 17:4; 2 Samuel 21:19-22, of the Rephaim/rapha of Gath). |
| Was Goliath called a "Nephilim"? | No, Scripture never uses that word of him. |
| Could he be linked to the Nephilim? | Only by inference (Gath ↔ surviving Anakim ↔ Nephilim, Joshua 11:22 + Numbers 13:33), plausible to some, unproven, and dependent on the disputed post-flood question. |
A textual note (this reference commits on textual fact): Goliath's height differs by manuscript, the Masoretic Text reads "six cubits and a span" (~9 ft 9 in), while the Septuagint and a Dead Sea Scrolls witness (4QSam^a) read "four cubits and a span" (~6 ft 9 in). Either way he was exceptionally tall for the era; the manuscripts simply differ on how much.
Common ground
All views agree: the Nephilim were renowned "mighty men" associated with great size/strength (Genesis 6:4; Numbers 13:33); the Anakim and Rephaim were real giant clans Israel encountered (Deu.2-3; Joshua 11:22); Goliath was a genuine giant of Gath's Rephaim line; and Scripture's interest is theological, God's people need not fear "giants," because the battle is the LORD's (Numbers 14:9; 1 Samuel 17:45-47). The identity-of-the-sons-of-God and Goliath-as-Nephilim questions are interpretive, not gospel-essential.