Question
What is predestination, and do we have free will?
Analysis
The main views
| View | How it fits sovereignty and choice together | Held by |
|---|---|---|
| Unconditional election (Calvinist / Reformed) | God chooses individuals for salvation out of his own good pleasure, not on the basis of anything foreseen in them. Human beings choose freely in that they act according to their strongest desire, but apart from grace no one desires God. Grace effectually brings the chosen to faith. | Reformed; Presbyterian; many Baptists |
| Conditional election (Arminian / Wesleyan) | God's choice is made in light of foreseen faith. God gives prevenient grace that restores the ability to respond, so the offer is genuinely open and genuinely refusable. | Methodist; Wesleyan; most Pentecostal; Free Will Baptist |
| Corporate election | The primary object of election is a people rather than a list of individuals: God chose Christ, and chose the church in him. Individuals are elect by belonging to that people. | Held across traditions, common in recent Pauline scholarship |
| Molinism (middle knowledge) | God knows not only what will happen but what any person would freely do in any circumstance, and providentially arranges circumstances accordingly. Sovereignty is complete and choices remain free. | Many Catholic thinkers; some evangelicals |
| Thomist / classical Catholic | God's grace moves the will infallibly and yet does not coerce it, because God works through the will's own nature rather than against it. | Roman Catholic tradition, Dominican strand |
The texts each side leans on
- Read as teaching unconditional choice: Romans 9:11; Romans 9:15; Romans 9:16; Romans 9:18; Ephesians 1:4; Ephesians 1:5; Acts 13:48; John 6:44; John 6:65.
- Read as teaching genuine, refusable offer: John 3:16; 1 Timothy 2:4; 2 Peter 3:9; Ezekiel 18:23; Ezekiel 33:11; Matthew 23:37; Acts 7:51; Revelation 22:17.
- Read as holding both without resolving them: Acts 2:23, where the crucifixion is both God's set purpose and a wicked act by responsible people; and Genesis 50:20, where the same event is human evil and God's good intent. Paul ends his own long treatment of the question not with a solution but with Romans 11:33.
What is agreed
| Point | Where Scripture speaks |
|---|---|
| Salvation is God's initiative, not a human achievement | Ephesians 2:8; Ephesians 2:9; Titus 3:5 |
| People are truly responsible for rejecting God | John 3:19; Acts 7:51; Romans 1:20 |
| The gospel is to be preached to everyone | Matthew 28:19; Acts 17:30; Romans 10:14 |
| God is not the author of evil | James 1:13 |
| Something here is beyond us | Deuteronomy 29:29; Romans 11:33; Isaiah 55:8; Isaiah 55:9 |
A note on how the debate is often misstated
Neither main side teaches what it is usually accused of. The Reformed position does not teach that people are dragged unwillingly, and it holds evangelism to be commanded and effective. The Arminian position does not teach that people save themselves, and it holds that no one comes to God without grace going first. Most of the heat in this argument comes from each side answering a caricature of the other.