Question
What does the Bible say about Christian tithing? Should a Christian tithe?
Analysis
The two passages each side leans on
For a continuing tithe: Malachi 3:8-10, 'Will a man rob God? Yet you are robbing Me!' in 'tithes and offerings', with the call to 'Bring the full tithe into the storehouse' (BSB). And Matthew 23:23, where Jesus tells the Pharisees they tithe herbs while disregarding 'justice, mercy, and faithfulness', then adds: 'You should have practiced the latter, without neglecting the former' (BSB).
For freedom in the amount: the whole of 2Co.8-9, where Paul organises a large collection and grounds it in Christ's self-giving (2 Corinthians 8:9) rather than a rule, explicitly saying he is 'not commanding' (2 Corinthians 8:8); and the observation that the New Testament's one detailed treatment of giving names no figure.
The main views, attributed
| View | Position | Held by |
|---|---|---|
| The tithe still binds | Ten per cent is the baseline, not the ceiling. It predates the Law (Genesis 14:20), so it is not merely Mosaic; Malachi 3:10 invites testing God in it, and Jesus affirmed it in Matthew 23:23. Giving beyond it is an offering. | Many Baptist, Pentecostal, Restorationist and non-denominational churches |
| Generosity binds, the percentage does not | The tithe belonged to Israel's covenant and its Levitical system, which the New Testament does not transfer to the church. Believers give proportionally, deliberately, and cheerfully (1 Corinthians 16:2; 2 Corinthians 9:7), for some far more than a tenth, for some in a hard season less. | Many Reformed, Lutheran, Anglican and Bible-church teachers |
| Ten per cent as a wise practice, not a law | The tithe is neither commanded nor forbidden for Christians; it is a useful, teachable starting discipline that guards against giving only what is left over. | Common pastoral middle position across traditions |
Common ground, which is larger than the dispute
All sides affirm that everything belongs to God (Psalms 24:1), that giving should be planned rather than impulsive (1 Corinthians 16:2), that it should be cheerful rather than coerced (2 Corinthians 9:7), that those who teach may be supported by it (1 Corinthians 9:14; Galatians 6:6), and that care for the poor is central rather than optional (Deuteronomy 15:7-11; 1Jo.3.17).
Contested / interpretive points
- Who was Malachi 3 addressed to? It is spoken to Israel under the Mosaic covenant, and specifically to priests misusing the offerings (Malachi 1:6-14). Whether its promise transfers directly to Christians is the crux of the disagreement, and it is the passage most often quoted without that context.
- Matthew 23:23 cuts both ways. Jesus tells people still living under the Law, before the cross, not to neglect the tithe. Whether that settles the question for the church after the cross is disputed.
- Hebrews 7:1-10 uses Abraham's tithe to Melchizedek to argue Christ's priesthood is superior to Levi's. It is cited by both sides, as evidence the tithe transcends Moses, and as evidence the Levitical system it belonged to has been superseded.
- ⚠️ Where this becomes pastoral rather than exegetical: teaching that withheld tithes bring a curse, or that giving guarantees financial return, goes beyond what any of the three views above claims from the text. Bubble Bible does not make promises the passage does not make.
- This entry takes no position on which view is correct.