Question
What is the atonement? Why did Jesus have to die?
Analysis
The main models
| Model | How it explains the cross | Associated with |
|---|---|---|
| Christus Victor / ransom | On the cross Christ defeats sin, death and the devil, and liberates those held captive | The dominant emphasis of the first thousand years; Irenaeus, Gregory of Nyssa; recovered in the 20th century |
| Satisfaction | Sin dishonours God; Christ's obedient death renders the honour due, which humanity owed and could not pay | Anselm, 11th century; a foundation of Catholic theology |
| Penal substitution | Sin incurs a just penalty; Christ bears that penalty in the place of sinners, so justice is satisfied and mercy extended | The Reformers; central in most evangelical and Reformed teaching |
| Moral influence / exemplary | The cross reveals the depth of God's love and so transforms those who see it | Abelard; emphasised in liberal Protestant theology |
| Governmental | Christ's death upholds the moral order of God's government, demonstrating the seriousness of sin without a strict penalty transfer | Grotius; common in Wesleyan and Arminian thought |
| Recapitulation | Christ lives the human life Adam failed to live, and so heals humanity from within | Irenaeus; strong in Eastern Orthodox theology |
The texts each leans on
- Victory / ransom: Mark 10:45; Colossians 2:15; Hebrews 2:14; Hebrews 2:15; 1 John 3:8
- Sacrifice and substitution: Isaiah 53:5; Isaiah 53:6; 2 Corinthians 5:21; Galatians 3:13; 1 Peter 2:24; Romans 3:25
- Reconciliation: Romans 5:10; 2 Corinthians 5:18; 2 Corinthians 5:19; Colossians 1:20
- Love displayed: Romans 5:8; John 15:13; 1 John 4:10
- Example to follow: 1 Peter 2:21; Philippians 2:5; Philippians 2:8
Why "had to"
The question of necessity is itself answered differently. Hebrews argues that without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness (Hebrews 9:22), and that the old sacrifices could not finally accomplish it (Hebrews 10:4; Hebrews 10:11; Hebrews 10:12). Jesus speaks of a necessity (Luke 24:26; Mark 8:31), and in Gethsemane asks whether the cup might pass and then submits (Matthew 26:39; Matthew 26:42). Traditions differ on whether the necessity is absolute, arising from God's justice, or a fitting choice of the way God determined to save.
What is held in common
| Point | Where |
|---|---|
| It was God's initiative, not a change in God's mind toward us | John 3:16; Romans 5:8; 2 Corinthians 5:19 |
| It was voluntary on Jesus' part | John 10:17; John 10:18; Philippians 2:8 |
| It deals with sin really, not notionally | 1 Peter 2:24; Hebrews 9:26; 1 John 1:7 |
| It is inseparable from the resurrection | Romans 4:25; 1 Corinthians 15:17 |
| It is received, not achieved | Ephesians 2:8; Ephesians 2:9; Romans 3:24 |
A caution worth stating: the models are often presented as rivals, and the New Testament does not present them that way. It piles up images without ranking them, and the strongest criticism of any one model is usually that it has been made to carry the whole weight alone.