Question
Who was Joshua the high priest? (Jeshua son of Jehozadak)
Analysis
The vision of the filthy garments (Zechariah 3)
Zechariah sees Joshua standing before the angel of the LORD with the accuser at his right hand to oppose him, and dressed in filthy clothes. The accuser is rebuked, the soiled garments are taken away, and Joshua is clothed afresh and given a clean turban (Zechariah 3:1; Zechariah 3:2; Zechariah 3:3; Zechariah 3:4; Zechariah 3:5).
The scene is usually read on two levels at once, and both are in the text: Joshua personally, a priest who had come out of exile and could not have met the purity the office demanded, and the priesthood and people he represented, since a high priest stood for the nation. He is then charged with conditions and a promise (Zechariah 3:6; Zechariah 3:7).
The Branch, and a crown (Zechariah 3:8; Zechariah 6:11-Zechariah 6:13)
Joshua and his fellow priests are called men who are a sign, and God announces that he will bring his servant the Branch (Zechariah 3:8). Later Zechariah is told to make a crown, set it on Joshua's head, and say that the man named the Branch will build the temple of the LORD, bear royal honour, and be a priest on his throne, with peace between the two offices (Zechariah 6:11; Zechariah 6:12; Zechariah 6:13).
That last part is the striking thing in an Israelite setting: kingship and priesthood were deliberately kept apart, kings came from Judah, priests from Levi, and a king who took priestly duty on himself was rebuked for it (2 Chronicles 26:16; 2 Chronicles 26:18). A single figure holding both is presented here as something new.
How to read it is contested. Some hold that the crowning enacts a promise about a coming figure, with Joshua standing in as a living sign, and Christian readers have long connected the Branch to Jesus, who is described in the New Testament as a priest of a different order than Levi's (Hebrews 7:14; Hebrews 7:15; Hebrews 7:16). Others read it as concerning Zerubbabel, the Davidic heir of the moment, with the text as it stands reflecting a later shift; and Jewish interpretation generally keeps the Branch as a messianic expectation not identified with Jesus. This reference sets the readings side by side and endorses none.
Kept in the record
Ezra 10:18 lists sons of Joshua among the priests who had married foreign wives and had to put the matter right. The books that honour him do not tidy his household out of the account, and the point is worth keeping for what it shows about how these records were written.
Why the two Joshuas get confused
Both names are the Hebrew Yehoshua, and the New Testament Greek form of that name is the same one rendered Jesus, which is why older English Bibles read Jesus at Acts 7:45 and Hebrews 4:8 where Joshua son of Nun is meant. Three distinct things share one underlying name: the conqueror, this high priest, and Jesus of Nazareth.
| Person | When | Known for |
|---|---|---|
| Joshua son of Nun | c. 13th-12th century BC | Moses' successor; Jericho and the settlement of Canaan |
| Joshua/Jeshua son of Jehozadak | c. 538-516 BC | First high priest after the exile; the second temple; Zechariah's visions |