Question
Why does God allow suffering and evil?
Analysis
The biblical data (largely agreed)
| Theme | Texts | What it establishes |
|---|---|---|
| Suffering is real and is not minimized | ~1/3 of the Psalms are laments (Psalms 13, Psalms 22, Psalms 88); Jesus wept (John 11:35) | Scripture never tells sufferers to pretend; it gives them honest words. |
| Origin in the fall | Genesis 3 (curse, pain, death enters); Romans 5:12 | Suffering and death are intruders into a good creation, not part of its original design. |
| Not always personal-sin punishment | John 9:1-3 ("neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents"); Luke 13:1-5 (tower of Siloam, "think ye that they were sinners above all…? I tell you, Nay") | Jesus explicitly rejects the assumption that suffering measures guilt. |
| No tidy answer given, Job | Job.38-42, God answers from the whirlwind with creation's vastness, not an explanation; Job's friends' "you must have sinned" theology is rebuked | The Bible's longest treatment refuses a neat formula. Job receives presence and sovereignty, not a reason. |
| Worked toward good and glory | Romans 8:18 ("the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory"); Romans 8:28 ("all things work together for good"); 2 Corinthians 4:17 ("light affliction… worketh… eternal weight of glory") | Suffering is bounded, purposeful, and not the last word, though Romans 8:28's "good" is defined as conformity to Christ (Romans 8:29), not "things turning out pleasantly." |
| God suffers with us in Christ | Gethsemane (Matthew 26:38-39); the cross; "touched with the feeling of our infirmities" (Hebrews 4:15) | The Christian claim is not that God explains suffering from a distance but that he entered it. |
| Final resolution | Revelation 21:4, "God shall wipe away all tears… no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying" | Suffering is temporary; the new creation ends it. |
A note Scripture is careful about: Romans 8:28 is a promise of ultimate good (Christlikeness, Romans 8:29), not a guarantee that every painful thing will resolve comfortably in this life. Misusing it as a quick fix (…) is widely cautioned against pastorally.
The major theodicies (how Christians explain the "why")
These are not all mutually exclusive, many thoughtful Christians blend several. Presented factually; this reference endorses none.
| View | Position | Held by (tradition) |
|---|---|---|
| Free-will theodicy | God made genuinely free creatures; much suffering results from the misuse of that freedom (sin, cruelty, injustice). A world with real love requires real freedom, which can be abused. | Augustine (with qualifications); Alvin Plantinga; classical Arminian, Roman Catholic, and Eastern Orthodox emphasis. Strong on moral evil; weaker on natural disaster and animal/infant suffering. |
| Soul-making theodicy | Suffering is the necessary environment for spiritual and moral growth; character, endurance, and hope are forged through hardship (Romans 5:3-5; James 1:2-4). | The Irenaean tradition; John Hick (in a modern form); echoed in much devotional theology. Critiqued where suffering seems to crush rather than form. |
| Greater-good / sovereignty theodicy | God permits suffering to bring about greater goods we often cannot see; his wisdom and purposes exceed our knowledge (Genesis 50:20, "ye thought evil… but God meant it unto good"; Romans 11:33). | Much classical theism; emphasized in Reformed/Calvinist traditions stressing God's sovereign ordering of all things. Critiqued as sometimes sounding dismissive to the sufferer. |
| Mystery / Joban theodicy | We cannot fully explain suffering; God's character is trustworthy, so we entrust ourselves to him without resolving the "why." Follows Job's own pattern. | Much pastoral counseling and biblical wisdom literature; embraced across traditions. Honest about the limits of explanation; critiqued for leaving the intellectual problem open. |
| Open theism | God does not exhaustively foreknow or determine future free choices; he responds in real time to a genuinely open world, and so is not the author of specific evils. | A minority of evangelical theologians (e.g. Boyd, Sanders, Pinnock). Rejected by the mainstream, which holds to exhaustive divine foreknowledge. |
Most traditions also affirm a Christ-centered and eschatological dimension alongside whichever theodicy they hold: that God shares our suffering in Christ (Moltmann, Bonhoeffer) and that the new creation will finally resolve what is now unresolved (Revelation 21:4), points nearly all Christians hold in common.
Two sub-problems often run together
Theodicy discussions sharpen when two distinct questions are separated:
| Sub-problem | What it asks | Which theodicies speak to it best |
|---|---|---|
| Moral evil | Why does God allow human cruelty, sin, and injustice? | Free-will theodicy is strongest here, genuine freedom can be abused. |
| Natural evil | Why disease, disaster, "acts of God" that no human chose? | Free-will is weaker here; greater-good/sovereignty, soul-making, fall-of-creation (Romans 8:20-22, creation "subjected to vanity"), and mystery do more work. |
Scripture also holds out a further frame across both: present groaning is the labor-pain of a creation awaiting redemption (Romans 8:22), suffering is not the permanent shape of the world.
A distinction most traditions make: God causing vs. permitting
A recurring sub-debate is whether God ordains/causes suffering or permits it within his sovereign frame:
| View | Position |
|---|---|
| Strong sovereignty | God ordains suffering for purposes we may not see; secondary agents bear the moral responsibility (Reformed emphasis; Genesis 50:20; Job.1-2). |
| Permissive will | God permits but does not directly author evil, using it for greater purposes (much Catholic and Arminian). |
| Open | God responds to a genuinely open world he does not exhaustively determine (open theism, minority). |
All three insist God is not the author of sin and is good, they differ on the mechanics of how his sovereignty and creaturely evil relate.
What Job actually teaches (the model case)
- Job is righteous, yet he suffers (the prologue,
Job.1-2, makes this explicit). - His friends' retribution theology (…) is shown to be inadequate and is rebuked (Job 42:7).
- Job demands an explanation from God.
- God answers from the whirlwind (
Job.38-41), displaying his sovereignty and the vastness of creation, not explaining the reason. - Job rests (Job 42:1-6), not because he learned the cause, but because he met God.
The takeaway endorsed across traditions: God's reply to suffering is ultimately his presence and trustworthiness, not a formula.
The pastoral counsel that crosses traditions
| Practice | Texts |
|---|---|
| Honest lament is allowed and godly | the lament Psalms; Lamentations 3 |
| Don't impose a cause on a sufferer | Job's friends as the warning; John 9:1-3 |
| Be present before being explanatory | Job's friends were best when silent (Job.2:13) |
| Hold hope without denying pain | Romans 8:18-25; 2 Corinthians 1:3-7 |
| Trust God's character amid mystery | the Joban pattern; Proverbs 3:5 |