All: Roman writers on Jesus and the first Christians

Roman writers on Jesus and the first Christians

Suetonius: "Chrestus", and the Jews expelled from Rome

Suetonius

In short

In his life of the emperor Claudius, Suetonius records in a single clause that Claudius "banished from Rome all the Jews, who were continually making disturbances at the instigation of one Chrestus", a notice most scholars connect with the expulsion that Acts 18:2 says brought Aquila and Priscilla to Corinth, though who "Chrestus" was, and in what year this happened, are both genuinely disputed.

What the text says. The sentence sits in a long list of Claudius's administrative acts, between the freedom of the Rhodians and the seating of German ambassadors, and it is all Suetonius says: "He banished from Rome all the Jews, who were continually making disturbances at the instigation of one Chrestus" (Claudius 25, Thomson/Forester translation). The Acts of the Apostles records the same emperor's order from the other end: Paul at Corinth "found a certain Jew named Aquila, a man of Pontus by race, lately come from Italy, with his wife Priscilla, because Claudius had commanded all the Jews to depart from Rome" (Acts 18:2, ASV).

What it shows, plainly. A Roman biographer, writing c. AD 121 with access to imperial records, independently confirms that Claudius (emperor AD 41-54) expelled Jews from Rome, which is what Acts 18:2 reports in passing. That much is not disputed. Everything beyond it is.

The contested points, each side stated. (1) Who was "Chrestus"? The majority reading, held by most historians of early Christianity, is that "Chrestus" is Christus, Christ, misspelled in the ordinary way (Chrestus was a common Greek name, and the Tacitus manuscript makes the same slip), and that the "disturbances" were quarrels inside Rome's synagogues over the preaching of Jesus as Messiah; on this reading Suetonius, who says "one Chrestus" as though the man were present in Rome, has misunderstood his source and has Christ agitating in Rome in the 40s. The minority reading takes the text at its word: an otherwise unknown Jewish agitator actually named Chrestus stirred up trouble in Rome, and the notice has nothing to do with Christianity. The 1855 editor of the translation held here, Thomas Forester, already took the first view; this file records both and endorses neither. (2) When? The fifth-century Christian historian Orosius dates the expulsion to Claudius's ninth year, AD 49, and claims Josephus as his authority, but no such passage exists in Josephus, so the date rests on Orosius alone. The contemporary historian Cassius Dio (60.6.6) records that early in the reign, in AD 41, Claudius did not expel the Jews, because they were too numerous, but forbade them to assemble. Some scholars identify Dio's measure with Suetonius's notice and put the event in 41; others keep the two apart and accept 49, which fits the sequence in Acts (Aquila "lately come from Italy" when Paul reached Corinth); the question is open. (3) "All the Jews". Whether the whole Jewish community left Rome, or only the leaders of the disturbance, is likewise argued; Dio's remark about their numbers is used on both sides.

Sources: Suetonius, Claudius 25; Acts 18:2; Cassius Dio, Roman History 60.6.6; Orosius, Histories against the Pagans 7.6.15-16.

---

Suetonius, Claudius 25
His military organization of the equestrian order was this. After having the command of a cohort, they were promoted to a wing of auxiliary horse, and subsequently received the commission of tribune of a legion. He raised a body of militia, who were called Supernumeraries, who, though they were a sort of soldiers, and kept in reserve, yet received pay. He procured an act of the senate to prohibit all soldiers from attending senators at their houses, in the way of respect and compliment. He confiscated the estates of all freedmen who presumed to take upon themselves the equestrian rank. Such of them as were ungrateful to their patrons, and were complained of by them, he reduced to their former condition of slavery; and declared to their advocates, that he would always give judgment against the freedmen, in any suit at law which the masters might happen to have with them. Some persons having exposed their sick slaves, in a languishing condition, on the island of Aesculapius, because of the tediousness of their cure; he declared all who were so exposed perfectly free, never more to return, if they should recover, to their former servitude; and that if any one chose to kill at once, rather than expose, a slave, he should be liable for murder. He published a proclamation, forbidding all travellers to pass through the towns of Italy any otherwise than on foot, or in a litter or chair. He quartered a cohort of soldiers at Puteoli, and another at Ostia, to be in readiness against any accidents from fire. He prohibited foreigners from adopting Roman names, especially those which belonged to families. Those who falsely pretended to the freedom of Rome, he beheaded on the Esquiline. He gave up to the senate the provinces of Achaia and Macedonia, which Tiberius had transferred to his own administration. He deprived the Lycians of their liberties, as a punishment for their fatal dissensions; but restored to the Rhodians their freedom, upon their repenting of their former misdemeanors. He exonerated for ever the people of Ilium from the payment of taxes, as being the founders of the Roman race; reciting upon the occasion a letter in Greek, from the senate and people of Rome to king Seleucus, on which they promised him their friendship and alliance, provided that he would grant their kinsmen the Iliensians immunity from all burdens. He banished from Rome all the Jews, who were continually making disturbances at the instigation of one Chrestus. He allowed the ambassadors of the Germans to sit at the public spectacles in the seats assigned to the senators, being induced to grant them favours by their frank and honourable conduct. For, having been seated in the rows of benches which were common to the people, on observing the Parthian and Armenian ambassadors sitting among the senators, they took upon themselves to cross over into the same seats, as being, they said, no way inferior to the others, in point either, of merit or rank. The religious rites of the Druids, solemnized with such horrid cruelties, which had only been forbidden the citizens of Rome during the reign of Augustus, he utterly abolished among the Gauls. On the other hand, he attempted to transfer the Eleusinian mysteries from Attica to Rome. He likewise ordered the temple of Venus Erycina in Sicily, which was old and in a ruinous condition, to be repaired at the expense of the Roman people. He concluded treaties with foreign princes in the forum, with the sacrifice of a sow, and the form of words used by the heralds in former times. But in these and other things, and indeed the greater part of his administration, he was directed not so much by his own judgment, as by the influence of his wives and freedmen; for the most part acting in conformity to what their interests or fancies dictated.

Suetonius, The Lives of the Twelve Caesars, translated by Alexander Thomson (1796), revised and corrected by Thomas Forester (Bohn's Classical Library, H. G. Bohn, 1855). Project Gutenberg #6390 (Volume 05: Claudius) and #6391 (Volume 06: Nero), both released 2004-12-13, most recently updated 2020-12-29. Public domain.

Sources, trace every one

Every cited verse, in full. Tap any reference to open it in the reader.

  • Acts 18:2bsb

    There he found a Jew named Aquila, a native of Pontus, who had recently come from Italy with his wife Priscilla because Claudius had ordered all the Jews to leave Rome. Paul went to visit them,

On contested questions we show every major view, attributed and cited, and pick no winner. Answers are synthesized from primary sources, truth you can trace, not opinion.

Suetonius: "Chrestus", and the Jews expelled from Rome · Bubble Bible