The evidence. The resurrection is the claim everything else turns on, and it has a genuine historical core that even many skeptical historians grant. Paul's letter to Corinth preserves a creed he says he "received" and passed on, that Christ died, was buried, was raised, and appeared to Cephas, the Twelve, more than five hundred at once, James, and Paul ([1 Corinthians 15:3–8]), material most scholars date to within a very few years of the events, far too early for legend to be the whole story. All four Gospels report an empty tomb, with women as the first witnesses (an unlikely detail to invent in that culture). The so-called "minimal facts" approach (associated with Gary Habermas and Michael Licona) builds only on points that command wide scholarly agreement: Jesus died by crucifixion; his followers sincerely believed they saw him alive afterward; the persecutor Paul and the skeptic James were transformed into believers. Bubble Bible holds a resurrection deep-dive.
The counter-case. What those agreed facts mean is where history reaches its limit. Skeptical explanations, that the appearances were visions or grief-hallucinations, that the tradition grew by legend, or (far less credited) theft, swoon or wrong-tomb theories, are offered precisely to account for the disciples' sincere belief without a bodily rising. The Gospel accounts also differ in detail (who came to the tomb, and whether the risen Jesus appeared in Galilee or Jerusalem), which critics read as legendary development and harmonisers read as independent testimony. The honest bottom line: historical method can establish that the earliest Christians sincerely and very early proclaimed that Jesus rose, and can weigh the natural explanations, but whether God raised him is a question that runs past what historical evidence alone can settle. It is where the traceable evidence hands off to faith, and this file says so rather than overclaiming.
---